CPD summary · Gold Coast education day

Spinal pain CPD: osteoporosis fill-in, when MRI beats X-ray, and a component approach to degeneration

Three talks from one Gold Coast CPD afternoon: an Irish endocrinologist filling in for an emergency spine surgeon on osteoporosis and bone health; a neurosurgeon on choosing investigations and illustrative cases; and a pain & rehabilitation specialist on the degenerative cascade component by component.

Prepared for GPs and health-interested readers · Australian practice context · Friday 5 June 2026 · about 2 hours · Otter title: “Spinal Pain Management Seminar”

Dr Gus Ovalton — osteoporosis & bone health (fill-in)
Irish endocrinologist / general medicine. Narelle introduces him clearly as Gus Ovalton (Otter also hears “Obolt,” “Obolcian”). Do not invent an alternate surname. He stepped in after Dr Yang apologised — emergency spine surgery overnight.
Dr Wayne Ng — choosing spine investigations
Neurosurgeon. Host notes he has taken over many of Dr Leon Tan’s patients and practice. Speaks on imaging choice, CT-guided diagnostic blocks, and case-based pitfalls.
Dr Charles Chow — chronic spinal pain / component approach
Pain and rehabilitation specialist. Kirkaldy-Willis cascade, disc / facet / Modic / stenosis / listhesis / Baastrup / SI joint / DISH, then rehab and hydrotherapy.
Host
Narelle. Self-record CPD event (no activity number — write “self-record”).
Read this as clinic education, not a protocol

GP-facing summary of one Gold Coast CPD seminar on Friday 5 June 2026 (Otter title: “Spinal Pain Management Seminar”; otter id oggmdWVJTbWELfddWt7tqGR2j14; ~1 hr 57 min). Not personal medical advice. Otter garbles many drug names (zoledronate not “zelandinate,” denosumab/Prolia, romosozumab, teriparatide, ONJ) and surnames. Where unclear, this write-up cleans carefully rather than inventing doses, brands, or surnames beyond what Narelle clearly said.

Setup — Dr Yang’s apology and Gus fills in

Narelle opens: this is a self-record event — no approved activity number; write “self-record” on your form and complete the evaluations. Dr Yang (neurosurgery) sends apologies — he is in emergency spine surgery that came through overnight (about six hours). In his place, a new endocrinologist / general medicine doctor — Irish — Dr Gus Ovalton — fills in with osteoporosis and bone health, which Narelle notes is still relevant to the day’s orthopaedic / spinal theme (she had also circulated his fact sheet).

Part 1 — Osteoporosis & bone health (Dr Gus Ovalton)

Learning aims he races through in ~20 minutes: identify high fracture-risk patients; relative efficacy of therapies; PBS framing for anabolics; prevent denosumab (Prolia) withdrawal fractures; counsel on osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) and atypical femoral fractures; and a few clinic tricks.

Why fracture risk beats BMD alone

Optimise first

Vitamin D >75 nmol/L (endocrine mind; some say 80; guidelines saying >30 nmol/L are not how the literature he cites bears out). Calcium ~1000 mg/day — ask patients to log food (MyFitnessPal / similar) rather than guess. Excess alcohol with low BMD is contributory. Then heavy resistance training — not the 1 kg pink dumbbell.

LiftMore / Onero — heavy resistance

The LiftMore trial (~2018, Griffith University; Belinda Beck / Linda Beck as heard) put postmenopausal women through powerlifting (deadlifts, back squats, overhead press, bench press) at ~80–85% of one-rep max, five sets of five. ~2.9–3% spine BMD gain at six months — comparable to weak pharmacotherapy at the spine (bisphosphonates ~5–8%; raloxifene ~2–3%). Onero / supervised bone-loading programs (licensed; Brisbane “bone living” network referenced) are the practical referral path when you will not personally coach an 80-year-old into back squats.

Relative lumbar spine BMD gains — schematic from talk comparisons Relative lumbar spine BMD gains (talk comparisons) ~3% LiftMore 2–3% Raloxifene 5–8% Bisphos. ~11–15% Romosozumab Schematic only — cerulean CPD diagram. Not a formal meta-analysis figure.
Gus’s slide comparisons put supervised heavy lifting in the same ballpark as weaker pharmacotherapy at the spine; romosozumab was described as head-and-shoulders above for BMD gain.

Bisphosphonates — oral and zoledronate

Denosumab / Prolia — cannot stop cold

Marketed from ~2013: six-monthly injection, very effective. From ~2016, case reports of rebound vertebral fractures after stopping or missing a dose — patients can lose all (or more) of their gains. First year after a missed dose is the danger window. You need an exit strategy before starting, especially in younger patients who may face decades on therapy. Approaches discussed: run teriparatide alongside then switch to zoledronate at the next due dose; if <~6 Prolia doses, zoledronate alone may suffice; after more doses you may still lose some gains. Bisphosphonates contraindicated in significant CKD may force denosumab — deal with exit when you must.

Atypical femoral fractures & ONJ

AFF rare but real after prolonged antiresorptive use (often discussed from ~5+ years; can appear from ~3). Lateral cortical stress pattern; ~20% bilateral / sequential — image the contralateral femur. Risk–benefit still heavily favours treatment (he quotes ~281 osteoporotic fractures prevented per AFF case). ONJ more a problem with oncology-dose regimens; for osteoporosis, counsel, fix terrible dentition before starting when possible, and typically keep ~6 weeks clear of invasive dental work. ONJ management may involve anabolic then lock-in with bisphosphonate — shared decision with maxillofacial teams.

Anabolics — sequence matters

Tibolone plug

Brief MHT aside: tibolone as effective for bone as estrogen in his framing, one tablet, estrogenic + androgenic (libido) “triple whammy.” Lower breast-cancer signal discussed with caveats (prior breast cancer — recurrence concern). Audience note: not on PBS; patches often preferred currently. Start peri-/early post-menopause to mitigate the precipitous BMD drop — it is not anabolic if you wait years.

Part 2 — Choosing spine investigations (Dr Wayne Ng)

Impetus: step back from “operate or not” to the investigations that lead there. Structural options: X-ray, CT, MRI. Functional: SPECT-CT. Mimics: ultrasound. Diagnostic lock-in: CT- or US-guided blocks. Adjunct: nerve conduction studies (limitations for pain fibres).

Choosing spine investigations — schematic Choosing spine investigations X-ray Dynamic / alignment Low dose; can mislead CT Bone morphology Soft tissue limited MRI Gold standard Soft tissue / cord SPECT-CT Osteoblastic activity ≠ always pain source CT-guided blocks LA diagnostic window = first 24h US / NCS Mimics; NCS miss pain fibres Clinical question first — then pick structural, functional, or both.
Start from why the patient came (injury vs gradual; axial vs radicular; rest/nocturnal/systemic) and anatomical localisation — then choose imaging.
ModalityBest forWatch-outs
X-rayDynamic / alignment; low dose; whole-spine overviewFalse reassurance; dynamic CT/MRI may eventually replace some roles
CTBone morphology; osteophyte / hard discCan miss soft disc; subtle clues only if you look
MRISoft tissue, cord, disc, neural compression — gold standardCost / access improving; still not always first test
SPECT-CTStructural + osteoblastic / metabolic activityHot spot ≠ always the pain generator
UltrasoundNon-spine mimics; accessibleNot a spine workhorse
CT-guided blockDiagnostic lock-in (LA) ± cortisoneCounsel patients about the first 24 hours
NCS / EMGMotor deficit, denervation, prognosisDoes not assess small pain fibres — poor for pure pain radiculopathy

Ng cases — false reassurance, soft vs hard disc, double crush

  1. 34-year-old, L3/4 radicular pattern. X-ray reassuring → CT hints at L3/4 → MRI shows large disc and tight canal. Classic false reassurance from plain films.
  2. 46-year-old, C6 radiculopathy 12 months. MRI disc bulge alone might suggest spontaneous resolution; CT shows osteophyte — chronic hard disc/osteophyte unlikely to vanish. After C5/6 ACDF she develops new shoulder pain within six months: adjacent soft disc at C4/5 (inflammatory, more painful, more chance of self-resolution — worth waiting if the patient can, to avoid a second fusion).
  3. 45-year-old, whiplash, huge asymptomatic cord-compressing disc that settles — then six months later myelopathy from the adjacent level blowing out → two-level disc replacement. Motion X-rays still useful to show preserved motion / instability.
  4. Post-hemilaminectomy spondylolisthesis in RA (rare <1% instability after hemilaminectomy): mechanical back pain years later; progressive slip; patent canal on MRI → needs fusion/stabilisation, not further decompression. SPECT facets light up as they try to stabilise.
  5. Type 1 diabetic double-crush: prior C6/7 foraminotomy for C7 radiculopathy; later medial forearm pain with good nerve-root block; then recurrent C7 pattern with triceps wasting — NCS/EMG plus brachial plexitis (plexus MRI abnormal) plus recurrent foraminal compression. Diabetes likely drives the neuritis. Surgical options limited; guarded prognosis; counsel honestly.

Closing imaging point: tumour cases sometimes need both CT and MRI — subtle foraminal widening on CT only makes sense once MRI shows the lesion. “Sky is blue — which blue?” applies to radiology opinions too: correlate to the clinical question.

Epidurals vs focal blocks

Ng on injections

Epidurals are largely non-diagnostic symptom treatment — drug spreads everywhere. Prefer something more focal (facet / nerve root) when you can. Rough ceiling ~3–4 injections/year; if needing more, refer for a definitive plan. Spend two minutes counselling that the local anaesthetic diagnostic window is the first ~24 hours — otherwise patients report “it didn’t work” and forget the day-one relief.

Part 3 — Component approach to degeneration (Dr Charles Chow)

Chronic spinal pain framed via Kirkaldy-Willis degenerative cascade: dysfunction (disc water loss, annular fissures, endplate and cartilage wear) → instability / laxity → restabilisation — often at different stages at different levels. Tell patients degeneration is like white hair and wrinkles: common, not automatically the pain source. >50% of people over 50 scanned have some degeneration — imaging ≠ pain.

Component approach — disc, facet, Modic, stenosis, listhesis, SI / Baastrup Component approach to spinal degeneration Disc black / vacuum herniation types Facets extension pain medial branch ± diary Modic 1 edema / inflammation basivertebral ablation* Stenosis tripod metaphor neurosurg first if progressive Listhesis mild vs giving-way Baastrup interspinous bursitis SI joint can refer past knee *Overseas common; AU kits TGA-pending at talk. Schematic — cerulean CPD.
Split the problem: disc, facets, endplates (Modic), canal/recess, alignment — then match treatment to the component that fits the exam.

Disc

Facets

Modic type 1

Endplate edema/inflammation: low T1 / high T2. Type 1 is the best-recognised pain phenotype (types 2 and 3 can hurt too). Overseas: basivertebral nerve ablation for axial pain not clearly discogenic or facetogenic. Australia: makeshift kits historically; formal kits going through TGA at the time of the talk.

Stenosis & the tripod

Multifactorial: ligamentum flavum, facet osteophytes, disc. Claudication → prefer neurosurgical assessment first if progressive, to judge urgency. Therapeutic (not diagnostic) epidurals for surgery-averse patients — results variable; be honest. Tripod metaphor: when the spine “drops,” central canal, lateral recess (traversing root), and foramen (exiting root) all crowd.

Spondylolisthesis, Baastrup, SI joint, DISH

Chow’s closer

Understand component by component so patients grasp that degeneration on a scan is not automatically the pain source — plenty live pain-free with “worn” spines. Mix judicious intervention / medicines with regular physical rehabilitation and maintenance (including hydrotherapy).

Take-home messages for clinic

spinal-pain.drkotha.com · cerulean theme · CPD education for Australian general practice